
WV GEMS (West Virginia Geriatric Educators of
the Medical Schools)
Geriatrics Case for Interdisciplinary Sessions
Created by: Mark A. Newbrough, MD
Criteria:
Cases for RHEP Interdisciplinary Sessions need to be flexible in order to accommodate groups with different compositions.
Material presented is relevant to all health sciences students.
Material requires students to prepare for session.
Cases should touch on attitudes and knowledge, at least, and skills when possible (or build on students previous efforts on skills such as assessment of cognition, ADL’s, or mood).
Facilitator should have experience providing care (according to his/her discipline) for the elderly-but only necessary criterion.
Should include material for at least: Medicine, Nursing, Pharmacy, Dentistry, and Social Work. Physical therapy may be added when appropriate.
Learning Objectives:
After participating in this IDS case-based exercise, learners will:
Case, Part A
Mrs. G. is an 84 year old widow who lives alone and has lost 10 lbs. over the past year. She has been a patient at your community health center (CHC) for more than 20 years. Her husband, who also was a patient at the CHC, died 7 years ago. Her past medical history includes Type II diabetes mellitus and hypertension. She has one adult daughter who lives in another state. Mrs. G. is always delightful to talk to, even though she has lately been bringing more physical complaints to her visits at the CHC. Despite multiple medication adjustments, her blood pressure and serum glucose (or HgA1c) have both been uncontrolled for at least two years. She wonders to you if she is ever going to “get better”, and after two years without any demonstrable progress, you are beginning to wonder the same thing. After all, she is 84 years old.
Questions, Part A
Facilitator Tips
This question is intended to explore some of the myths and stereotypes
related to older patients. Is memory
loss a normal part of aging (and therefore occurs in everyone), and does such
memory loss necessarily have a negative impact on care, or is there something
that can be done? In addition, this
question introduces the topics of polypharmacy and medication
non-adherence/noncompliance.
Facilitator Tips
This question is intended to explore ways that aging-related changes in
organ function/physiology, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics may have an
impact on the care of hypertension and diabetes as people age. An interesting would be to consider with the
group how aging of the involved health care providers may also have an impact
on the care delivered.
Facilitator Tips
This question is intended to touch on issues related to goal setting,
including the principles of informed consent, capacity, and in particular the
need to focus on outcomes that are intended to maximize functional status. If Mrs. G. has problems that are not going
to go away, then how can we help her to live with her
condition (s)? Ask the question: “What do you mean by “get better”, Mrs.
G.?” Follow with “What do you mean,
health care provider, by “get better” for Mrs. G.?” Shouldn’t there be some overlap in these two definitions?
Facilitator Tips
This open-ended question is intended to get the learners problem
solving on what additional information is needed about Mrs. G. as well as to
outline some possible causes of weight loss in such a patient. Ask if this amount of weight loss is even
significant, or just another part of getting older.
Facilitator Tips
Ageism is so common still that all of the learners will likely be able
to recall episodes from their own personal experience. Hopefully they will begin to understand how
destructive the attitudes and misbeliefs that are ageism can be.
Facilitator Tips
This question allows the opportunity to consider established guidelines
for care of hypertension and diabetes mellitus in the elderly. It also encourages the students to revisit
the matter of goal-setting. The
facilitator should emphasize that evaluation and goal-setting must be
individualized for Mrs. G. because of the difficulty of predicting how any
given older patient will likely respond to any given treatment.
Case, Part B
Mrs. G. arrives for a visit to the CHC one day late in the afternoon. She is obviously confused and running a low grade fever. Her clothes smell of urine (the first time you have noticed this). You admit her to the local hospital. On her first night there, she falls trying to get out bed and fractures her hip. For the next several days she remains confused to the point that she has to be restrained both physically and chemically. By the time her delirium clears she has pressure ulcers over her sacrum and both heels. Her daughter who came in from out of town, reports that Mrs. G.’s home is a total mess, with 8 cats running around, and with multiple old prescription bottles intermingled with more recent bottles. She comes to the CHC and asks you how long you have known that Mrs. G. was demented. You are surprised at these revelations, and do not have any good answers for her daughter. She is distraught to think that her mother has been living in such conditions and asks for your help in getting Mrs. G. into a nursing home.
Questions, Part B
Facilitator Tips
Any time an older patient goes from level of care to another, they are
at risk. Proactive communication
between all members of the care team is critically important, and should
include specifically information about allergies, medications, known medical problems,
functional status (including memory and decision making capacity), information
about any advanced directives, and caregiver contact information. Having all of this information may not have
prevented Mrs. G.’s fall, but not having it certainly increases her risk.
Facilitator Tips
Multiple risk factors are identified: including antihypertensive
therapy, poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, dementia, delirium, urinary
incontinence, strange environment, and acute illness. This case is a good opportunity for the students to learn and
discuss a wide range of very common geriatric syndromes, at least in an
introductory fashion, depending on the time allowed. In fact, there is probably enough here for two learning sessions.
Facilitator Tips
Discussion here should center on how to screen patients for increased
risk, and what steps to take to prevent pressure ulcers. This is also a good opportunity to highlight
the multiple risks from iatrogenesis that routinely face older patients when
they are admitted to the hospital.
Facilitator Tips
Here the issue is again to think about mentation of older patients when
they are admitted. Actually, in this
case, Mrs. G. should have already been screened for both cognitive and mood
problems at the CHC. This is a good opportunity
to talk about routine screening and periodic screening, even in patients you
have known for a long time (or perhaps especially in those patients-in order to
keep a fresh perspective). If the
hospital care team had realized that Mrs. G. was confused, they may have taken
steps to decrease nighttime confusion.
Have the students list what those steps might include. Also, they should be able to discuss common
treatments for delirium, including the critical need to focus on the underlying
cause and address that issue as part of the treatment plan.
Facilitator Tips
Differentiate between acute and chronic urinary incontinence and the
workup for both. Part of that workup
should probably wait until Mrs. G. has recovered, since the events that
occurred in the hospital will likely effects on her continence.
Facilitator Tips
It is important that we cannot guarantee that any older patient will
“never fall again”. There is no
treatment that has been shown to do this, although there are many things that
we can evaluate/do for Mrs. G. to decrease the risk of future falls. In addition, there are also things we can do
to address her osteoporosis that may reduce the risk of fracture, even if she
does fall. Review the management of
osteoporosis briefly.
Facilitator Tips
This questions touches on many issues.
How would you decide the most appropriate level of care for Mrs. G.’s
recovery? How do Medicare guidelines
influence your choices? Does Mrs. G.
have capacity to decide for herself?
How should we choose a surrogate decision maker for Mrs. G. if she has
not designated her daughter as her medical power of attorney? Introduce the topics of incompetence and
guardianship. Remind the learners of
how helpful having this type of information before a problem arises is to
patients, their families, and the health care team.
Facilitator Tips
This is a fairly common situation, and causes much angst for both
families and health care providers.
Routine screening for dementia and mood disorders may have identified
the need for more careful home medication management, and perhaps a home safety
assessment for Mrs. G. Discuss with the
learners how one goes about obtaining a home safety assessment. Although not likely in this case, it would
also be a good time to introduce the concept of elder abuse and neglect (what
if the daughter knew what the home was like and failed to bring it to anyone’s
attention?).
Finally, this case
should have led to discussion about the use of tools to assess/screen cognitive
function (e.g. the MMSE), mood problems-especially depression in a patient who
is declining in a vague sort of way (e.g. the Geriatric Depression Scale),
overall function (ADL’s and IADL’s), and home-safety assessments. In order to emphasize, it might be a good
idea to provider copies of these instruments to the learners. Emphasize the need to incorporate these
types of screenings as just as important as screening for cholesterol or
cancer, especially in the elderly.