Minutes of the RHEP Community Member and Student Retreat

 

October 28, 2002, The Haven Inn, Sutton, West Virginia

 

The following persons were present:  Shannon Bell, Site Coordinator, Chuck Conner, Site Coordinator, Hilda Heady, Executive Director, Lisa Hileman, Community Representative, Mary Lafferty, WVSOM medical student. Shirley Neal, Community Representative, Akela Neumaier, Medical student, Jill Powell, WVSOM medical student, Elaine Price, WVSOM medical student, Heather Ross, WVU medical student, Owen Stout, Community Representative, Stephen Thomas, Site Coordinator, David Tingler, WVU medical student, Malinda Turner, Site Coordinator, April Vestal, Associate Director, Robert Walker, MD, Marshall U School of Medicine

 

Morning refreshments served from 9 a.m. until 9:30 a.m.

 

Beginning at 9:30 a.m., Lisa Hileman provided the welcoming and opening remarks for the retreat. Lisa noted background information on previous RHEP retreats and the outcomes from the retreat held in January of 2001. She read the vision and mission of the RHEP program.

 

The students were asked to share their experiences with the RHEP program and identify areas that were important to them. This included:

 

Opportunities after medical school

 

How to retain residents

 

Malpractice insurance issues

 

Financial incentives

 

What communities can do to retain physicians?

 

Physician Retention Issues (recruiting outside the state, diversity, and retaining WV graduates)

 

The value of interdisciplinary sessions (IDS).

 

The group determined the topics they would like to discuss in more detail. Discussion is listed as follows:

 

Interdisciplinary sessions - Felt that these are important, there could be other ways to incorporate the interdisciplinary concept through service learning, students had positive experiences with IDS, sites should be flexible with IDS and how it is accomplished, IDS was viewed as a value not a requirement, the RHEP curricula components are meant to work together, not all sites have IDS regularly due to student numbers, and consistency in curriculum is important.

 

Malpractice - important to have places for students to go, good practice models should be created, state has made some positive changes this year, important issue but too big of a topic to discuss at this retreat.

 

Opportunities/Financial Incentives/Loan Repayment - when is the best time to get this information to students, a lot of incorrect information is communicated to students, 3rd year a good time for WVU medicine, 2nd year a good time for WVSOM medicine, federal clinics do not have malpractice issues, students don't know what they want to specialize in early in their education which makes it harder to commit, rural residency programs are being developed.

 

RHEP - Student recommendation for more involvement and interaction with the community while on rotation. Didn't get a perspective of what it would be like to work in the community. Is the RHEP model working? Would the program be better served by selecting and supporting a smaller number of students that are interested in primary care and staying in WV? Should RHEP narrow its focus? RHEP is at a crossroad to be self-reflective and make positive changes. Important for WV and medical schools to provide doctors for WV and a good education no matter where the students practice.

 

Student Dream Jobs - not sure, family practice at a primary care clinic, practice in a rural community for 20 years then return to India, contract signed to return to Air Force following graduation - will return to WV following that, spouse will be unable to find work in engineering in WV - will have to work elsewhere, and family practice or geriatrics in a rural area.

 

Dr. Robert Walker provided a presentation on "How Are We Different? Barriers to Access to Care in the Mountain State." The presentation focused on southern WV and how it is statistically higher than the national average in several health issues and disparities.

 

Lisa thanked Dr. Walker for his informative and inspiring presentation. She thanked everyone for attending the retreat and for their contributions. The group thanked Lisa for her work in planning the retreat. The group agreed the retreat was beneficial and should be held yearly. Chuck Connor stressed the importance of students getting information from their classmates in order to share concerns and ideas for improvement in the RHEP program. Chuck Connor and Steve Thomas announced they are the Site Coordinator representatives on the Student Advisory Panel and look forward to working with this committee this year.

 

 

 

 

 

Lisa provided an overview of the topics discussed throughout the day. Shannon Bell recommended the group develop next steps from the meeting.

 

Next steps from the retreat include:

 

Issues on IDS and policies in RHEP will be referred to the School Committee and Site Coordinators. It was recommended that a joint School and Site Coordinator meeting be held to review policies and variance issues.

 

It was recommended that consortia identify contact persons to talk with students about practice opportunities at their facilities and in the state.

 

It was recommended that students in their 1st and 2nd year of medical school be included in future retreats.

 

Hilda Heady will contact the Financial Aid offices at the three medical schools to disseminate information on the financial incentives and programs available in the state.

 

Dr. Walker recommended that systems or models of practice opportunities be created for students in the state.

 

April Vestal will send a list of the 330 clinics to students on the panel. A plan will be developed to communicate this information to all students.

 

The group was provided with envelopes to send comments and suggestions on this and future retreats to Lisa Hileman

 

In closing, students were asked "What Would You Need to Stay in WV?" The responses were:

 

Jobs

 

More information on incentive programs

 

Money (financial support)

 

Cultural diversity

 

The retreat concluded at 1:30 p.m.